Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Redefining QUAIDE: paving the way for better AI in preclinical endoscopy
  1. Hui Li,
  2. Tiantian Zhang,
  3. Qin Guo,
  4. Shufen Zhou,
  5. Chengshan Guo
  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, The People’s Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Hui Li; chipperli{at}163.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with great interest the recent article by Antonelli et al 1 on the quality assessment for artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy (QUAIDE) framework, which enhances the quality and reproducibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based gastrointestinal endoscopy research. While QUAIDE provides a solid foundation for pre-clinical research design, we see opportunities for further improvement in several key areas.

First, preclinical endoscopy AI research often involves sensitive patient data, requiring strict adherence to data privacy and ethical standards.2 Currently, the QUAIDE framework does not adequately address data privacy protection, particularly in terms of anonymisation, de-identification, data-sharing agreements and informed consent. Including these standards is crucial for ensuring patient data safety, especially in multicentre collaborations, where varying anonymisation practices across centres increase the risk of data breaches.3 Establishing unified data management …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors HL conceived and wrote this letter. TZ, QG, SZ and CG revised the letter. HL is the guarantor.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Medical and Health Research Project of Baoan District (No. 2023JD071, 2023JD079 and 2023JD250) and the Key Specialties in Clinical Medicine of the People’s Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen (No. 8).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.