Table 3

The relationship between direct, practical measures of a non-invasive screening test’s accuracy, how each measure informs assessment of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and the consequence of the result for a screening programme

Test resultDiagnostic verification*Result of diagnostic verificationRelated accuracy characteristicProgramme consequence
PositiveYesTrue, hence TP (TP1, TP2)†Relative sensitivity; TP1/TP2 Detection of neoplasia
Positive predictive value;
TP1/(TP1+FP1)
TP2/(TP2+FP2)
Efficiency of detection
False, hence FP (FP1, FP2)Relative FP rates; FP1/FP2 Burden associated with detection
NegativeNo
Test result Diagnostic verification* Result of diagnostic verification Related accuracy characteristic Programme consequence
PositiveYesTrue, hence TPSensitivity;
TP/(TP+FN)
Detection of neoplasia
Positive predictive value;
TP/(TP+FP)
Efficiency of detection
False, hence FPBurden associated with detection
NegativeYesTrue, hence TNSpecificity; TN/(TN+FP)Accuracy of detection
Negative predictive value;
TN/(TN+FN)
Exclusion of neoplasia
False, hence FNMiss rate (missed lesions)
  • The upper section shows relationships when paired testing is undertaken and only test-positive cases undergo colonoscopy while the lower section refers to the situation when all cases undergo colonoscopy.

  • *Verified by colonoscopy.

  • †TP1,TP2—TP by tests 1 and 2; FP1,FP2—FP by tests 1 and 2.

  • FN, false negative; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.